Feedback Form

Authors

  • 213
  • 1044
  • 983
  • 478
  • 311
  • 746
  • 990
  • 116
  • 1040
  • 861
  • 216
  • 1025
  • 572
  • 141
  • 388
  • 1017
  • 837
  • 157
  • 248
  • 513

Sign-in

Essay

222
Essay by Jon (222) from United Kingdom - Author's age: 28 years old

Summary

As energy and food security decline in the 21st century, the ability of centralised institutions and production methods to deal with a mounting crisis seems to decline in equal measure. This essay argues that society needs to rethink, reorganise and revolutionise its organisational structure, adapting the resources at its disposal toward decentralised production methods. This would help to create an independent, responsible and sustainable society which can avoid an ensuing economic and social catastrophe. Whilst we possess the technology and knowledge to overcome our problems, history shows our fate is dependent upon our ability to evolve, adapt and change.

Comments

305
Comment by Ruxandra on Tuesday 31 March 2009 at 11:24
Congratulations, I wish you all the best in the future projects. I read your essay and I am happy that I had the opportunity to see the ideas of a sustainable future.
738
Comment by Christian on Tuesday 31 March 2009 at 17:21
Congratulations! It's a good essay. One small concern/question. Firstly, everything you say on the energy side I agree with completely, well put! My issue is with your suggestions for food. While I totally agree that smaller, decentralised production, closer to urban areas could be beneficial, the idea about having intense, indoor production is worrying. The Ecologist magazine highlighted this week the growing occurance of MRSA caused by 'factory farming' of animals in the Netherlands. Even indoor grown vegetables risk losing important trace nutrients. Would outdoor organic gardens in urban areas (roof-tops maybe), not be a better, safer solution, and leave the animals away from dense human settlements?! Otherwise, top essay..
Comment by fiona on Tuesday 31 March 2009 at 18:53
Congratulations Jon! You make a very articulate argument for decentralization. I completely agree that decentralized systems are more resilient, diverse and interdependent (3 important qualities in a sustainable system) than the centralized production and distribution methods we have now. I think it's important to combine a move to decentralize with a long term, constraints-based definition of sustainability (see Holmberg et al. 1996 & Ny et al. 2006), to make sure any one initiative is not worse than what we have now. This decentralization is one of the biggest lessons we learn from the microcosm of Cuba's Food & Energy crisis in the 1990s.

You must be signed in to post a comment.

Bookmark and Share