Feedback Form

Authors

  • 428
  • 728
  • 323
  • 231
  • 504
  • 958
  • 572
  • 817
  • 159
  • 855
  • 809
  • 811
  • 872
  • 650
  • 1007
  • 902
  • 511
  • 752
  • 386
  • 731

Sign-in

Essay

386
Essay by Daniel (386) from Netherlands - Author's age: 19 years old

Summary

In a world where disconcerting episodes like the Food Crisis and Global Warming have struck the world in a draconic fashion, we have no time for idealistic solutions: pragmatism should be the key word. Therefore, this essay proposed to look at present conundrums, identify the most pressing bottlenecks that hinder development, and tackle them at their roots. If we are to ensure the well being of future generations, we are not to move the masses; we are to move the bottleneck of tomorrow.

Comments

Comment by Kirsten on Thursday 26 March 2009 at 15:13
I find your essay a true revelation. I never looked at the problems of nowadays in that perspective. It is an incredible interesting essay which is very well written.
Comment by Tessa on Sunday 29 March 2009 at 18:56
This is truly inspiring work. We should look beyond static ideals and start to recognise where the bottlenecks of tomorrow are. It is time for pragmatic scenario's like yours, because 'times like these ask for pragmatism in favor of idealism'.
Comment by Sem on Monday 30 March 2009 at 11:50
I think that you make an interesting point of focusing on pragmatic solution , especially as a reaction to the unsophisticated idealistic tendencies often found in present day popular debate on environmental problems. However I do think that by not giving content to concepts like 'development' and 'human well-being' we run into the risk of equating those concepts solely with economic development and economic welfare. So although I agree with you that pragmatism should be the key word, critical and ongoing reflection of essential concepts is needed in order to determine what the bottlenecks are and what kind of pragmatic actions is needed to overcome those. Pragmatism without any content can hardly be seen as a solution.
Comment by Sander on Monday 30 March 2009 at 13:02
Thoughtfull and well-written essay! As a member of an older generation I must admit that we were (and are) very easily impressed by technical solutions for social problems. Generations of engineers have been working on renewable energy techniques, and still we made only limited progress. So it is a refreshing idea to concentrate on the (mainly social) obstacles that hinder further progress, and tackle them first.Perhaps we need more pragmatism in this field!

You must be signed in to post a comment.

Bookmark and Share